Free UI Design
Analyzer

Screenshots are uploaded to our server, resized/compressed into JPEGs, stored on Cloudinary and sent to a third-party AI provider for analysis. Image URLs, mode, scores, feedback, recommendations, palette, timestamps and hashed IP addresses are stored in the database. Uploaded designs and analysis results are retained indefinitely to provide shareable results, maintain scan history and improve the accuracy and consistency of UI Analyzer. We may use submitted designs, scores and analysis results to evaluate patterns, test changes and improve the tool internally. Eligible scans may appear in Recent Scans/public areas and shareable result links may remain accessible. This internal evaluation is separate from third-party AI processing; it is not a claim that we or a provider train AI on submissions. There is no automatic expiry. For privacy or deletion requests, use the contact page and include your result link; removal of a database report alone does not remove its Cloudinary image.

Browser analysis and shareable results are free with no account required. Daily usage limits apply, and an available rewarded ad can unlock an additional scan. The downloadable PDF report is a separate paid option.

JPG, PNG, and WebP files up to 10MB. For best results use a full-page or component screenshot at 1x or 2x resolution, and avoid heavily compressed thumbnails.

Eight criteria are scored independently: color, spacing, alignment, consistency, hierarchy, typography, corner rounding, and icon consistency. They're then blended using mode-specific weights, so a dashboard layout puts more weight on alignment and consistency than a poster design would.

90–100 is S-grade (publication ready). 80–89 is A-grade (professional quality). 70–79 is B-grade (good with minor fixes). Below 60 means there are foundational issues worth addressing before shipping.

Web UI, Mobile, Poster, Dashboard, Social and Packaging select different scoring weights and visual context for the AI prompts. Spacing/alignment matter more for interfaces; hierarchy/color matter more for posters and social graphics. These are advisory priorities, not a physical touch-target or usability test.

Yes. Mobile mode uses mobile-focused visual context and emphasizes spacing and alignment. A screenshot cannot verify actual touch-target dimensions or interaction behavior.

The analyzer evaluates common visual-design signals such as contrast, spacing, alignment, hierarchy and consistency. It is intended as a structured second opinion, not a replacement for professional user research or human design judgement.

Partly. Hierarchy, spacing and alignment are visual signals that affect usability, so a low score there often points to a UX problem too. But the analyzer only sees a static screenshot: it cannot test user flows, navigation, interactions, accessibility with assistive technology or how real people complete tasks. Use it as a visual first pass alongside usability testing, not as a UX audit.

UI analysis means reviewing a screen for visual-design problems, color, spacing, alignment, hierarchy, typography, before real users see it. This tool automates that review: upload a screenshot and it runs the same eight checks a designer would, then returns a score and specific fixes instead of a vague opinion.

Yes. UI analyzer, UI checker, and design checker all describe the same job here, checking a screenshot against consistent visual-design rules. There's no separate mode to switch on; every upload runs the full check for free.

Yes. Upload a screenshot of your site (desktop or mobile) in Web UI mode and you'll get a UI score out of 100, plus the category breakdown behind it, at no cost and with no login. It's a fast way to rate your website's UI before asking for outside feedback.

Yes. See the scoring methodology for the eight criteria and mode weights. You can use those criteria for a separate manual review alongside the automated analysis.